A.I. in Screen Trade

The Rise of Interactive Storytelling: A New Frontier for Screenwriters

As we navigate our way through the ever-evolving landscape of contemporary screenwriting, it becomes increasingly clear that the traditional modes of storytelling are being challenged. In the shadow of streaming services and their persistent quest for novelty, a new form of narrative is making its stand: interactive storytelling. This immersive form of story-crafting, exemplified by the 2018 Netflix special, “Black Mirror: Bandersnatch,” invites the audience into the creative process, allowing them to actively shape the narrative. But what does this development mean for us, the architects of story? How does it influence the way we conceive and craft our tales?

Interactive storytelling is not a wholly new concept; it has been a cornerstone of video games for decades. It represents an expansion of the “choose-your-own-adventure” books many of us remember from our childhood. However, the incorporation of this technique into mainstream film and television content represents a new horizon, a frontier that offers exciting possibilities and substantial challenges for the craft of screenwriting.

In traditional narratives, we weave a single, carefully plotted thread from the inciting incident to the denouement. But interactive storytelling requires a much more complex tapestry. Each decision point becomes a branching narrative path, each with its own twists, turns, and ultimate outcomes. As the narrative bifurcates and re-bifurcates, the writer must maintain coherence, thematic consistency, and emotional engagement across potentially dozens of unique trajectories.

The screenwriter must also consider how their stories can be elegantly fractured into decision points. Traditional film narratives often rely on dramatic events that irrevocably alter the trajectory of the story. In an interactive narrative, such key events are replaced by moments of choice, where the audience decides the direction of the narrative. Crafting these decision points requires a keen understanding of your characters, ensuring that each potential choice is true to their motivations and development.

However, the challenges are accompanied by unprecedented opportunities. Interactive narratives enable screenwriters to explore characters, themes, and story-worlds with a depth and complexity that traditional linear narratives can rarely achieve. Consider “Bandersnatch.” Each pathway through the narrative offered a different perspective on the protagonist’s struggle, his relationships, and the overarching theme of free will versus determinism. As such, interactive narratives can become prismatic, refracting characters and themes into a spectrum of possibilities.

In this emerging format, one must also consider the audience’s role in the narrative. How will their choices reflect on them, or change their perception of the story? Can we, as writers, create decision points that not only drive the narrative forward but also provoke introspection? In fact, the audience’s engagement with the story becomes an integral part of the storytelling itself. In this sense, we aren’t just creating narratives; we’re crafting experiences.

Adapting to this form of storytelling will undoubtedly demand a shift in our writing processes. We may find ourselves plotting our narratives in non-linear brainstorming sessions, mapping out the various branches like a game designer rather than a traditional screenwriter. There will be a need to develop new writing tools and technologies to accommodate this shift. And as always, there will be a period of trial and error, of creative experiments that succeed brilliantly or fail instructively.

And yet, despite the challenges, the possibilities for interactive storytelling are boundless. Imagine a romantic drama where the audience’s choices lead to different relationship outcomes, or a mystery where the audience can follow different clues, leading to various resolutions. The creative space we have to explore is exponentially larger than anything we’ve tackled before.

But this is just the beginning. As technology continues to evolve, so too will the possibilities for interactive narratives. Virtual reality and augmented reality platforms could offer even more immersive narrative experiences, placing the audience literally in the shoes of the protagonist. We may even see AI algorithms generating dynamic narratives that adapt to the audience’s choices in real time.

The rise of interactive storytelling signals a sea change in the world of screenwriting. It challenges many of our traditional assumptions and pushes us to think of narrative in new and exciting ways. As daunting as it may seem, this new frontier also offers us an opportunity to broaden our creative horizons, to tell stories that are more intricate, more immersive, and more personally meaningful to our audience. And isn’t that what storytelling is all about?

As screenwriters, we are adventurers by nature, explorers of the human condition. Interactive storytelling is just the latest territory to be charted, a new world to be discovered and understood. So let us venture forth with our pens (or keyboards) in hand, ready to explore this promising frontier, excited by the challenges and the opportunities it holds.

✍️ Whether you’re mastering the art of dialogue, structure, or character development, the power of AI can be a game-changer in your writing journey. My Free Ebook, ‘AI for Authors’ delves into how AI-powered prompts can provide a unique edge to your storytelling process. If you’re intrigued by the prospect of supercharging your fiction skills, download your free copy today and explore new horizons in creative writing.

WGA Strike Update: June 13, 2023

Over the past week, there have been significant developments in the ongoing Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike of 2023, which began on May 2, 2023.

As a brief reminder, the WGA strike is an ongoing labor dispute between the Writers Guild of America, representing 11,500 writers, and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP). This strike is the largest disruption to American television and film production since the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, and it is also the largest labor stoppage that the WGA has performed since the 2007–08 strike.

The crux of the dispute revolves around residuals from streaming media and the use of artificial intelligence in scriptwriting. The WGA asserts that the share of residuals that the AMPTP gets from streaming media has significantly cut the average income of writers compared to a decade ago. Moreover, the WGA wants AI, like ChatGPT, to be used only as a tool for research or to facilitate script ideas, and not as a tool to replace writers.

Before the strike, the Guild proposed terms that would yield writers about $429 million a year, in stark contrast to the AMPTP’s offer of $86 million. The WGA proposed the inclusion of “mandatory staffing” and “duration of employment” terms in their contract, which would require all shows to be staffed with a minimum number of writers for a specified period, regardless of need, according to the AMPTP. Another major proposal from the WGA was to ensure each member of a writing team receives their own pension and health care funds, a proposal rejected by the AMPTP without a counterproposal.

Despite lengthy negotiations with the AMPTP, a satisfactory agreement was not reached by the mandated deadline of May 1, 2023. As a result, an overwhelming majority of the WGA membership voted to go on strike.

In the past week, there hasn’t been a resolution to the strike, but there has been a notable development. The Directors Guild of America (DGA) announced that they reached a tentative agreement with the AMPTP on June 4, 2023. However, the WGA stated that its bargaining positions remain unchanged since May 1, 2023, and they would refrain from commenting on the DGA’s deal points out of respect for their ratification process.

In a display of unity, the WGA is also standing in solidarity with the SAG-AFTRA membership, who are in the process of completing their strike authorization vote.

As the strike continues, the WGA remains steadfast in its demands, and we will continue to monitor the situation closely. The current state of affairs underscores the ongoing complexities of labor negotiations within the entertainment industry, particularly in the age of streaming and AI. Stay tuned for more updates in the coming weeks.

In Solidarity.

The Influence of Streaming Services on Screenplay Structure

The advent of streaming services has ushered in an era of unparalleled accessibility and consumption of visual content, leading to significant shifts in the domain of screenwriting. This change is most evident in the transformation of screenplay structure, adapting to the demands of an audience with the power to binge entire seasons in one sitting. To understand the ramifications of this shift, this article will explore how narrative pacing, episodic structure, and plot development have evolved in the streaming era.

The Pacing Paradigm: From Traditional TV to Streaming

One of the key aspects to be influenced by the emergence of streaming services is the pacing of narrative. In traditional TV, the pacing of a script is often dictated by the need to retain viewers across commercial breaks and weekly episodes. Cliffhangers and plot twists typically align with these breaks, with the aim of luring viewers back. This format necessitates episodic plots that maintain a balance between advancing the overall narrative arc and offering self-contained stories.

Contrastingly, streaming services allow viewers to watch entire seasons at their own pace, thus liberating the pacing of narrative from the constraints of commercial breaks and weekly slots. This has resulted in the phenomenon commonly referred to as ‘slow-burn’ storytelling. Shows like “Stranger Things” or “The Crown” exemplify this, allowing narratives to unfurl gradually over multiple episodes, crafting nuanced character arcs and plotlines that reward patient viewership.

Reinventing Episodic Structure: Serialization vs. Anthology

Alongside pacing, streaming platforms have influenced episodic structure. Traditional network television often veers towards procedural or semi-procedural formats where each episode introduces and resolves a unique problem, while still nudging the overarching plot forward. This format allows viewers to jump in at any episode without feeling lost.

However, streaming services have intensified the trend towards serialization, where each episode is a mere fragment of a larger narrative. Serialization favors complex, long-form storytelling, facilitating intricate plotlines and character development. This is evident in shows like “Breaking Bad” and “Ozark”, where each episode feeds into a larger, interconnected narrative.

Additionally, streaming platforms have also revived the anthology format, where each episode or season tells a distinct story. This format is well-suited for exploring diverse themes, characters, and settings in a single series. Netflix’s “Black Mirror” or Amazon Prime’s “Modern Love” demonstrate this, captivating audiences with standalone stories that provide a satisfying narrative experience in a single sitting.

Plot Development: Embracing Complexity

Streaming services have catalyzed a shift towards complex plot development. Traditional TV, given its episodic nature and commercial breaks, typically required simpler, more linear narratives to maintain audience engagement. However, the ‘binge-watching’ culture prevalent in the streaming era encourages intricate and layered storytelling.

We now witness multifaceted narratives unfold over multiple episodes or seasons, with richly developed characters, expansive world-building, and intricate subplots that would be challenging to accomplish within the constraints of traditional television. This trend is best demonstrated by shows like “Game of Thrones” and “The Witcher”, which explore extensive character rosters, multiple timelines, and complex plotlines.

The Implications for Screenwriters

So, what does this shift mean for aspiring and established screenwriters? On one hand, it offers the opportunity to write without the constraints of commercial breaks and episodic resolutions. On the other, it necessitates a deeper understanding of long-form storytelling, character development, and pacing that sustains viewer interest over prolonged narratives.

Moreover, writers should be aware of the potential for viewer fatigue that can stem from overly complex or sluggish narratives. Balancing these considerations is key to successful screenwriting in the era of streaming.

Conclusion

The influence of streaming services on screenplay structure is a testament to the evolving nature of screenwriting. As writers, it’s crucial to adapt to these changes and utilize them to enhance our craft. Embracing the slow-burn pacing, serialization or anthology format, and complex plot development can yield narratives that not only cater to the consumption habits of the modern viewer but also push the boundaries of storytelling in exciting new directions.

The Evolution of the Anti-Hero in Modern Television

Once upon a time, the protagonists of our favorite shows were, by and large, paragons of virtue and morality. They were the heroes, their deeds noble, their intentions pure. But as the medium has evolved, so too has the nature of its central characters. We’ve witnessed a steady rise in the prevalence of a different type of protagonist: the anti-hero. Unlike the traditional hero, the anti-hero is a morally complex character who exists in the gray areas between right and wrong. This article aims to explore the evolution of the anti-hero in modern television, focusing on the development of this character type and its impact on narrative structure.

The anti-hero has been a staple of literature and drama for centuries, dating back to the likes of Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Dostoevsky’s Raskolnikov. However, their surge in popularity on television is a relatively recent phenomenon, arguably starting in the late 1990s and early 2000s with shows like “The Sopranos” and “The Shield.” These series gave us protagonists like Tony Soprano and Vic Mackey – characters who, despite their ruthless and morally questionable actions, captivated audiences with their complexity and depth.

This trend continued and expanded with series like “Breaking Bad,” “Mad Men,” and “House of Cards,” each introducing their own unique brand of anti-hero. Walter White, the chemistry teacher turned methamphetamine manufacturer; Don Draper, the charismatic yet deeply flawed advertising executive; Frank Underwood, the scheming politician with a Machiavellian thirst for power. These characters, while deeply flawed, became some of the most iconic figures in television history. They were not the heroes we were used to, but we were drawn to their stories nonetheless.

So, why this shift? Why are audiences so fascinated by these morally ambiguous characters? The answer, in part, lies in their complexity. The anti-hero offers a departure from the traditional black-and-white morality of the classic hero archetype. They exist in the gray areas, walking the line between hero and villain, good and evil. This ambiguity mirrors the complexity of real life, where moral dilemmas are rarely straightforward and people are not simply “good” or “bad.”

The rise of the anti-hero also coincides with a general shift towards more serialized storytelling in television. Unlike episodic shows, where each episode is a self-contained story, serialized shows tell one continuous story over multiple episodes or even an entire series. This format allows for greater character development, giving writers the opportunity to delve into the complexities and contradictions of their characters. In this sense, the anti-hero is a product of serialized storytelling, as their development often hinges on their moral ambiguity and the choices they make over time.

However, the popularity of the anti-hero is not without its challenges. As writers, we must tread a careful balance between making our anti-heroes complex and ensuring they don’t cross the line into being unlikable or irredeemable. This requires a deep understanding of character development and narrative structure. We must show the consequences of their actions, both for themselves and those around them. We must give them moments of vulnerability and humanity, moments that allow the audience to empathize with them despite their flaws. And perhaps most importantly, we must give them a compelling and believable arc, one that explores their struggles with morality and the consequences of their actions.

Consider Walter White from “Breaking Bad.” Over the course of the series, we see Walter transition from a sympathetic character – a high school chemistry teacher diagnosed with terminal lung cancer – to a ruthless drug kingpin. Yet, despite his increasingly immoral actions, we continue to engage with his story, because we have been given a window into his psyche and his motivations. Throughout the series, we witness critical turning points in Walter’s transformation, each demonstrating his increasing capacity for brutality and moral compromise.

From his first act of violence – the killing of Krazy-8 – to his refusal of an easy out for financing his cancer treatment, choosing instead to continue manufacturing methamphetamine with Jesse Pinkman. We see him let Jane, Jesse’s girlfriend, die, realizing her death would remove an obstacle in his path. We watch as he chooses to take drastic measures against rival drug dealers, asserting his power in the process, and later declaring himself to be the danger, the one who knocks. Finally, in a move that solidifies his transformation, he orchestrates the death of his enemy, Gus, using a bomb in a retirement home, demonstrating just how far he’s willing to go to secure his power.

In all of these moments, we see the struggle of Walter White, the man, against Heisenberg, the persona he has created for himself in the world of methamphetamine production. And yet, despite the moral decay, we continue to engage with his story. We sympathize with his initial plight, the desperation of a dying man trying to secure his family’s future. We understand the allure of power and control in a life that has seemingly spun out of his grasp. And we are captivated by the tragedy of a man losing himself to his worst impulses.

In conclusion, the rise of the anti-hero in modern television is a testament to the evolving tastes and expectations of audiences. It reflects a desire for more complex, morally ambiguous characters who reflect the realities and contradictions of human nature. This evolution provides exciting opportunities for us as writers to explore new depths of character and narrative structure. However, it also poses challenges, demanding a delicate balance of complexity and likability, and a nuanced understanding of morality and consequence. As we continue to delve into the gray areas of morality, we must remember to ground our characters in authenticity and humanity, creating compelling, believable arcs that engage our audiences and provoke thought and discussion. As the anti-hero continues to evolve, so too must our approach to crafting these complex characters, continually pushing the boundaries of what is possible in television storytelling.

How to Write Powerful Visual Description in Your Screenplay

In the realm of film, the visual dimension plays a paramount role in the storytelling process, shaping audience experience and comprehension of narrative threads. Given the magnitude of its influence, screenwriters must master the art of conveying visual information succinctly and powerfully in their scripts. This post aims to elucidate key strategies for composing potent visual descriptions in screenplays, thereby enhancing the cinematic quality of narratives.

The Value of Visual Description in Screenwriting

Before delving into the specifics of constructing effective visual descriptions, we must first recognize their intrinsic value. Screenwriting is fundamentally a visual undertaking; it’s about painting vivid scenes that translate seamlessly onto the big screen. Visual description, or action description, serves as the backbone of this visual narrative, defining the setting, character actions, and non-verbal communication while driving the story forward. It forms the roadmap that guides the director, production designer, actors, and the entire filmmaking crew.

Balancing Brevity and Clarity

While writing visual descriptions, one of the cardinal rules is to balance brevity with clarity. Film is a time-based medium, and each page of a script is roughly equivalent to a minute of screen time. Therefore, screenwriters must communicate essential visual details as economically as possible.

While drafting these descriptions, screenwriters must avoid verbose prose and unnecessary details that do not contribute to plot progression or character development. The goal is to immerse the reader without overloading them with information, which can be achieved through focused, clear, and concise language.

Consider an example:

Overwritten: The room is a testament to years of neglect, with faded wallpaper peeling off to reveal the crumbling plaster beneath, a dusty chandelier hanging precariously from the ceiling, a threadbare rug on the creaky wooden floor, and a lopsided painting hanging on the far wall.

Rewritten: A neglected room — faded wallpaper, a dusty chandelier, threadbare rug, and a lopsided painting.

The revised version conveys the same imagery in fewer words, maintaining the essence of the scene while keeping the pace intact.

Show, Don’t Tell

An extension of the “show, don’t tell” rule from fiction applies to screenwriting. Instead of explaining character emotions or traits, it’s far more powerful to show these through actions or visuals. In other words, you must strive to depict rather than simply report.

For instance, rather than writing, “John is nervous,” show his nervousness with something like, “John taps his foot rapidly, eyes darting around the room.” This approach enables audiences to deduce the emotional state of characters, offering a more engaging experience.

Active Verbs Over Adjectives

Powerful visual descriptions thrive on active verbs rather than adjectives. Active verbs invigorate the narrative, add momentum to the story, and paint more vibrant images. For instance, “Sarah storms out of the room” is more powerful and visual than “Sarah is angry and leaves the room.”

Using Specific, Sensory Details

Screenplays are not novels, but that doesn’t mean they should skimp on specificity. Including sensory details can enhance the richness of the scene, immersing the reader (and eventually the viewer) in the script’s world. For instance, “the sound of the city’s hustle filters in through the cracked window” employs auditory detail to set the scene and convey the environment.

Metaphors and Similes

Used judiciously, metaphors and similes can be powerful tools for enhancing visual descriptions. They can express complex emotions or situations succinctly, and offer a creative way to establish a visual style. For example, “Her smile is as sharp as a guillotine” is not just about a character’s smile; it speaks volumes about her character.

Final Thoughts

Visual description, done effectively, is an art in itself. It requires a fine balance between brevity and detail, between showing and telling, and between creating both clarity and intrigue. Mastery of this aspect of screenwriting can help the script leap off the page, captivating the reader’s (and eventually the viewer’s) imagination while creating a blueprint for a truly cinematic experience. It’s a skill that’s honed over time, with practice and consistent refinement, but its mastery undoubtedly stands as a testament to a screenwriter’s craftsmanship.