A.I. in Screen Trade

Crafting a Legal Antihero: A Study in Narrative Excellence in ‘Better Call Saul’

In its six-season run, “Better Call Saul” has masterfully carved out a space for itself in the landscape of television drama. The show’s meticulous writing, under the stewardship of Peter Gould and Vince Gilligan, has transformed a morally ambiguous side character from “Breaking Bad” into a complex protagonist whose journey is as compelling as it is tragic.

The narrative structure of “Better Call Saul” has been a study in measured pacing and understated storytelling. The show does not rely on constant twists or shocks; instead, it slowly builds its narrative around the incremental changes in its characters, with every action, choice, and consequence meticulously depicted. An entire episode could revolve around a single sight gag inside a department store, yet it’s these seemingly trivial moments that form the connective tissue of the larger narrative arc.

A significant aspect of the show’s writing is its ability to balance humor with pathos, often within the same scene. This narrative strategy is especially visible in the character of Jimmy McGill, who oscillates between moments of levity and despair, a trait shared with other characters in similar shows like “Barry”. The show’s dialogue is frequently sharp and witty, demonstrated in lines such as, “What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 60? Your Honor,” yet they often mask the underlying melancholy and desperation of the characters.

The character development in “Better Call Saul” is some of the finest in television. The transformation of Jimmy McGill into Saul Goodman is not a sudden shift but a gradual and painful process. Every decision he makes, every line he crosses, is a step towards his inevitable downfall. Jimmy’s relationships with the other characters, particularly with Kim Wexler, are complex and nuanced, adding layers to his character. Kim, excellently portrayed by Rhea Seehorn, is a compelling character in her own right, with her own moral struggles and dilemmas. Her lines such as, “Either you fit the jacket, or the jacket fits you,” encapsulate the struggle between personal desires and professional ethics, a recurring theme in the series. The narrative constantly challenges us to empathize with its flawed characters, even as we’re appalled by their actions.

“Better Call Saul” also excels in its thematic exploration. The show delves into themes of identity, morality, and the corrosive effects of ambition. The series repeatedly emphasizes the idea that actions have consequences, a theme mirrored in shows like “Billions” and “Boardwalk Empire.” Jimmy’s transformation into Saul Goodman is not just a change in name but a loss of identity, a sacrifice made in the pursuit of success. It’s a tragic fall, and the writing ensures that we feel every step of it.

Comparatively, shows like “The Good Fight” and “Show Me A Hero” also utilize the legal drama genre to explore social issues and moral dilemmas, yet they maintain a more conventional narrative structure. “Better Call Saul”, however, stands out for its unique blend of character-driven storytelling and thematic depth.

The writing also significantly influences other elements of the show. The acting performances, particularly from Bob Odenkirk and Rhea Seehorn, effectively convey the complex emotions and moral struggles of their characters. Their performances are shaped by the nuanced writing that provides depth to their characters. The directing and cinematography also reflect the show’s slow and deliberate pacing, with long shots and sequences allowing the audience to fully absorb the implications of each scene. The sound design, too, complements the writing, often utilizing silence and ambient noise to heighten the tension in key moments.

Culturally, “Better Call Saul” has had a significant impact. Despite not having won an Emmy prior to its final season, the show has been widely acclaimed for its writing, acting, and storytelling. It has contributed to the larger discourse around antiheroes in television and has continued the narrative legacy of “Breaking Bad” while carving out its own distinct identity.

In conclusion, “Better Call Saul” is an exemplar of television writing. Its narrative structure, dialogue, character development, and thematic exploration are all of the highest caliber. The show’s gradual pacing and character-driven storytelling might not appeal to all viewers, but for those who appreciate thoughtful, nuanced narratives, “Better Call Saul” is a rewarding experience. The show’s writing not only crafts a compelling narrative but also explores larger themes of morality, identity, and the human capacity for change. As Kim Wexler so eloquently puts it, “Winning doesn’t always mean ‘getting a favorable verdict at trial’,” and “Better Call Saul” is a testament to the victories that can be achieved through stellar writing.

✍️ Whether you’re mastering the art of dialogue, structure, or character development, the power of AI can be a game-changer in your writing journey. My Free Ebook, ‘AI for Authors’ delves into how AI-powered prompts can provide a unique edge to your storytelling process. If you’re intrigued by the prospect of supercharging your fiction skills, download your free copy today and explore new horizons in creative writing.

The Anatomy of an Adaptation: Turning Books into Screenplays

In the richly intertwined realms of literature and cinema, one timeless phenomenon persists — the adaptation of books into screenplays. From timeless classics like “Gone with the Wind” to modern hits such as “The Hunger Games”, the path from page to screen is a well-trodden, albeit complex, journey. This article will delve into the fascinating challenges, methodologies, and the creative liberty inherent in adapting a book into a screenplay.

1. Translating Mediums: From Word to Visual Narrative

The primary challenge in adaptation is the very nature of the mediums involved. Books allow for an introspective look into a character’s thoughts, with the liberty to delve into backstories, indulge in descriptive passages, and explore complex inner conflicts. Screenplays, on the other hand, demand visual storytelling. They need to externalize what’s inherently internal in books.

Adapting a book into a screenplay often involves a process of distillation. The essence of the story must be captured while letting go of elements that may not translate well on-screen. The interior monologues might become voice-overs, detailed descriptions could evolve into settings, and psychological complexities may manifest as visual symbols or actions.

2. Structure: Aligning Prose to Screenplay

Another important aspect is the structure. Novels can afford to be sprawling, discursive, and multi-layered. Screenplays, in contrast, typically adhere to a three-act structure — setup, confrontation, and resolution. They demand a more streamlined narrative that drives the story forward.

In an adaptation, a 300-page novel needs to be condensed into approximately 120 pages of a screenplay. This process often involves identifying the central narrative, trimming subplots, and distilling characters, all the while ensuring the story’s integrity is maintained. For instance, the adaptation of “The Lord of the Rings” brilliantly navigates this complex task, maintaining the epic’s heart while making necessary adjustments for cinematic storytelling.

3. Characters: Essence and Evolution

Characters form the heart of any narrative, and translating them from book to screen can be particularly tricky. The challenge lies in maintaining the essence of the characters while also allowing for their evolution in the screenplay.

For example, take Hermione Granger from the “Harry Potter” series. While the essence of Hermione’s character — intelligent, brave, and loyal — remains consistent across both mediums, her character in the films often exhibits a toughness that’s only subtly present in the books. This evolution not only suits the visual medium but also strengthens the narrative dynamics.

4. Dialogue: Crafting Conversations

The dialogue in novels often delves into expositions and intricate discussions. However, cinematic dialogues demand brevity and dynamism. They must advance the story, reveal character, or ideally, do both at the same time. Screenwriters adapting a book must therefore master the art of transforming prose into dialogue that suits cinematic storytelling.

5. Creative Liberty: The Fine Line

One critical question that arises during adaptation is – how faithful should one be to the source material? This balancing act between fidelity and creativity is a quintessential part of the adaptation process.

The film “Adaptation,” written by Charlie Kaufman, offers an innovative perspective on this dilemma. Instead of providing a straightforward adaptation of “The Orchid Thief”, Kaufman weaves in a narrative that includes his struggles with the adaptation process, effectively breaking the fourth wall. This bold move demonstrates the extent of creative liberty possible in adaptations, albeit with a healthy respect for the source material.

Conclusion

Adapting a book into a screenplay is an exciting and demanding journey, one that involves as much creativity as it does structural precision. It requires the transformation of internal narratives into visual storytelling, the crafting of succinct structures and dialogues, and the careful handling of characters. At its heart, though, it involves finding the delicate balance between being faithful to the original work and bringing a fresh perspective that resonates with the cinematic audience. As such, the art of adaptation is not just about translation, but also about transformation — a process that, when done right, brings about a beautiful alchemy of storytelling.

WGA Writers’ Strike: A Fifty-Day Struggle and What’s Next

On the fiftieth day of the Writers Guild of America (WGA) strike, there is an air of determination among the picketing writers. Despite the hardships of the past weeks, writers remain committed to their fight for a fair contract with the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP).

WGA leadership has been critical of the AMPTP, claiming that the fifty-day mark has highlighted a “callousness” on their part. AMPTP has been accused of refusing to return to the negotiating table, using the excuse that they can only negotiate with one union at a time. The WGA has also accused the AMPTP of a “divide and conquer” strategy, attempting to strike a deal with one union in order to pressure others to follow suit. However, the WGA remains steadfast, vowing not to succumb to such tactics this time around.

The WGA has received notable support from other Hollywood unions, including IATSE and the Teamsters. These alliances have resulted in a number of productions being shut down across the country, affecting shows and movies like the Netflix comedy pilot “Little Sky” in New Mexico and “BMF” in Georgia.

The WGA has also seen solidarity from labor unions outside Hollywood. For instance, the United Teachers of Los Angeles, which went on strike for six days in 2019, made its presence known on the eve of Day 50 of the WGA strike, showing support at the Warner Bros lot alongside the cast and crew of Abbott Elementary and the Nurses Union.

However, the financial strain is beginning to show. As WGA members enter the eighth week of the strike, many are likely to begin experiencing economic hardship due to the work stoppage.

The industry now faces a possible second strike as the Screen Actors Guild‐American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) union, representing 160,000 actors, is in negotiations with the AMPTP. A-list stars, including Jennifer Lawrence and Meryl Streep, have indicated their readiness to walk off the job if a “transformative deal” on higher base pay and safeguards around the use of artificial intelligence is not reached.

SAG-AFTRA has already voted to give its leaders the authority to call a work stoppage if talks break down before their contract expires with figures like filmmaker and actor Judd Apatow stating the need for actors to go on strike to address the issues affecting everyone in the industry.

The AMPTP, which negotiates on behalf of the studios, had no comment on the ongoing talks with SAG-AFTRA. The studios and the WGA have not held talks since the writers’ strike began on May 2, with the AMPTP claiming to have offered “generous” pay increases but unable to agree to all of the writers’ demands.

The WGA walkout is already having an impact on caterers, prop suppliers, and other small businesses that generate a large portion of their income from Hollywood productions. The last writers’ strike in 2007 and 2008 cost the California economy an estimated $2.1 billion.

As the industry braces for a possible second strike, it’s clear that the issues underpinning these labor disputes are deeply rooted and far-reaching. The next weeks will be critical in shaping the future of Hollywood labor relations.

[Please note that this article is a summary of the situation as it stands at the time of writing, June 30, 2023, and the situation may have changed by the time you read this.]

Dialectics of Dark Comedy

Succession, the critically acclaimed HBO series, has undoubtedly captured the imagination of viewers worldwide. Within the American television landscape, it has emerged as a leading example of dark comedy writing, a sub-genre of comedy that employs a distinctively caustic sense of humor. By tackling issues such as power, wealth, and family dysfunction, Succession illuminates the darkest corners of human nature while eliciting laughter from its audience, a characteristic trait of dark comedy.

Dark comedy, or black comedy, has long been a staple in the film and television industry, dating back to classics like Dr. Strangelove or more contemporary films like Fargo. However, Succession’s unique blend of satirical wit and poignant drama has elevated the genre to new heights in the realm of American television. This article will delve into the intricacies of dark comedy writing, with a specific focus on Succession, analyzing the tools and techniques used to evoke laughter from even the most somber situations.

Succession: A Darkly Comic Landscape

Succession centers on the wealthy Roy family, media tycoons who are entangled in a perpetual struggle for power within their empire. The characters, while wrapped in opulence, are fraught with insecurities, jealousy, and greed – human flaws that the series gleefully magnifies. This irony, the contrast between their external success and internal turmoil, forms the backbone of the show’s dark comedic tone.

Showrunner Jesse Armstrong leverages this ironic dissonance to great effect. Through the utilization of fast-paced dialogue, piercing one-liners, and deftly written situational humor, Armstrong manages to convey the grotesque reality of the Roys’ world in a way that is both entertaining and disturbing. For example, the Roys’ constant belittling and ridiculing of one another, while objectively cruel, elicits laughter due to the sheer absurdity of their interactions. This blurring of the line between tragedy and comedy is a hallmark of dark comedy, and Succession does it exceptionally well.

Techniques in Dark Comedy Writing

The power of dark comedy writing lies in its ability to blur traditional boundaries, forcing viewers to laugh at situations typically associated with discomfort, fear, or even despair. This effect is achieved by incorporating several essential techniques that contribute to the creation of a humorously dark narrative.

Irony and Satire

Irony and satire are crucial components of dark comedy. Succession employs these elements, using them as a lens to expose the Roys’ lives as a stark contrast to their public image. The characters’ wealthy status is often juxtaposed against their inability to navigate basic human relationships, creating a satirical critique of the wealthy elite’s perceived superiority.

Morbid Humor

The use of morbid humor, which takes typically grim or taboo subjects and presents them in a humorous or absurd light, is another essential tool in the dark comedy writer’s arsenal. For instance, Succession’s no-holds-barred approach to topics like addiction, death, and betrayal is rendered comical through the characters’ nonchalant reactions, creating a disconcerting, yet undeniably humorous, effect.

Unsympathetic Characters

Dark comedies often feature deeply flawed, unsympathetic characters, and Succession is no exception. The Roys are riddled with shortcomings, from narcissism to manipulative tendencies. Yet, the audience can’t help but be drawn to them, laughing at their misfortunes while simultaneously questioning their moral compass. This provokes a sense of cognitive dissonance in the viewer, a powerful tool that dark comedies use to create emotional complexity.

The State of Dark Comedy in 2023

In 2023, the television landscape has seen a noticeable increase in dark comedies, especially with streaming platforms broadening their range. Shows like Barry and Dead to Me have followed in Succession’s footsteps, using a similar blend of humor and drama to engage viewers. This trend suggests that audiences are increasingly open to narratives that push boundaries and offer a more nuanced, multifaceted view of humor.

The current climate offers aspiring screenwriters an opportunity to explore this genre. While dark comedy is a challenging style to master, it allows for a unique exploration of the human condition. Succession, with its masterful blend of dark humor and dramatic stakes, sets a high bar for those aspiring to enter this genre.

Final Thoughts

In the end, Succession’s success lies in its ability to blend satire, drama, and black comedy into a riveting narrative that compels viewers to laugh and cringe in equal measure. Its darkly comedic landscape offers a critical examination of power, privilege, and the human propensity for self-destruction, making it a standout in American television.

For aspiring screenwriters, Succession serves as a textbook study in dark comedy writing, demonstrating that even the gravest situations can be mined for humor. Whether it’s irony, satire, or unsympathetic characters, the tools of dark comedy are potent devices for creating a compelling narrative. However, it’s crucial to balance these elements with emotional depth and character development, ensuring the audience remains invested in the narrative.

Top 10 Movie Feasts

Food in film is not just a feast for the eyes but often holds a much more profound symbolic value. As an essential part of human life, food carries a wealth of cultural, emotional, and socio-political connotations. It can express love, celebration, unity, and comfort, but also denote conflict, disparity, and decadence. In this analysis, we will dissect the top 10 movie feasts of all time and examine how food symbolism enhances the narrative.

1. The Lavish Banquet: “Babette’s Feast” (1987)

No discussion of food in film can commence without mentioning Gabriel Axel’s “Babette’s Feast”. The titular feast in this Danish film signifies an act of generosity and grace, serving as a spiritual revelation for the austere community. It demonstrates how food can embody opulence, contrast cultural disparity, and ultimately, serve as a symbol of transformation and unity.

2. The Thanksgiving Showdown: “The Ice Storm” (1997)

Ang Lee’s “The Ice Storm” presents a tense Thanksgiving dinner, where food acts as a buffer for unspoken tensions and fractured relationships. The turkey, a staple of American holiday feasts, serves as a symbol of a shared cultural ritual but also the inherent hypocrisy in the Carver family’s interactions.

3. The Defiance of Consumption: “The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie” (1972)

Luis Buñuel’s surrealist film uses a series of interrupted dinners to satirize the bourgeoisie’s indulgence and pretense. Food, or rather, its absence, illustrates the characters’ existential dilemma and societal absurdities, highlighting Buñuel’s social commentary.

4. The Feast of Friendship: “Julie & Julia” (2009)

The final meal in “Julie & Julia”, featuring Julia Child’s boeuf bourguignon, embodies culinary ambition, friendship, and emotional sustenance. The feast celebrates the power of food to inspire, connect, and evoke joy, underscoring the film’s tribute to culinary arts.

5. The Symbolic Supper: “The Godfather” (1972)

The Italian-American family dinners in “The Godfather” are more than just culinary exhibitions. They illustrate the dichotomy of family love and mafia brutality, represent cultural identity, and often foreshadow impending violence, as in the infamous scene where Michael Corleone’s initiation into the family business is juxtaposed against the christening feast.

6. The Sorrowful Breakfast: “Citizen Kane” (1941)

The breakfast montage in Orson Welles’ “Citizen Kane” utilizes food to depict the gradual estrangement between Charles Foster Kane and his wife. The changing breakfast habits parallel their deteriorating relationship, demonstrating how food can subtly yet powerfully convey emotional shifts.

7. The Opulent Decadence: “Marie Antoinette” (2006)

Sofia Coppola’s “Marie Antoinette” uses food to portray the decadence of the French court. The elaborate meals and lavish pastries signify excess and pleasure, contrasting the outside world’s poverty and unrest, and foreshadowing the impending French Revolution.

8. The Power of Nourishment: “Ratatouille” (2007)

“Ratatouille” elevates food to a medium of expression, capable of evoking deep emotional responses. The climactic feast, a simple ratatouille dish, underlines the film’s theme of artistry beyond societal conventions and has the power to transport Anton Ego, the feared critic, back to his childhood, illustrating the nostalgia and comfort associated with food.

9. The Last Supper: “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom” (1984)

The “Chilled Monkey Brains” feast in “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom” is a memorable meal filled with exotic and grotesque delicacies. The meal serves to exaggerate cultural differences and heighten the suspense of the foreign and perilous adventure ahead.

10. The Feast of Unification: “Eat Drink Man Woman” (1994)

The opening sequence of Ang Lee’s “Eat Drink Man Woman” displays a grand feast preparation, emphasizing the importance of food in familial bonds and cultural heritage. The weekly Sunday dinners symbolize the changing dynamics within the family, reflecting the conflicts and unity between traditional and modern values.

Conclusion: The Significance of Food in Film

Cinema’s top feasts are not merely about the food presented. They serve as a reflection of societal norms, a narrative tool, and a character definer. These meals, filled with symbolic ingredients, open up dialogues about culture, human relationships, and societal constructs. They allow audiences to digest layered meanings, enhancing the cinematic experience.