Introduction: Falling Down the Rabbit Hole
When Lewis Carroll penned his hallucinogenic tale “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland” in 1865, it’s doubtful he foresaw just how far-reaching his creation would be. The story has not only been translated into more than 97 languages, but it’s also been adapted, re-adapted, and re-imagined across a myriad of mediums—from stage plays to video games. This speaks volumes to Carroll’s storytelling prowess and the malleability of his narrative. But one adaptation that stands out in its audacity and flair is Tim Burton’s 2010 film, “Alice in Wonderland.”
Burton is no stranger to the absurd or the whimsical, but even for him, adapting Alice was a high-stakes gamble. For starters, this wasn’t just any children’s story; it’s a tale deeply ingrained in collective cultural memory. It comes with a set of expectations, and Burton, being Burton, didn’t shy away from turning some of these expectations on their heads.
Before digging deeper, let’s address the mammoth in the room: adaptation itself. Adapting a book into a screenplay is a Herculean task for any filmmaker. For the uninitiated, writing a screenplay differs significantly from writing a novel or a short story. The visual grammar, pacing, and yes, the screenplay structure, all have their unique requirements and limitations. What works in a 300-page novel could become cinematic molasses if translated shot-for-shot onto the screen. Conversely, what seems skimpy on page could turn into a moment of pure cinematic gold.
Now, why focus on the screenplay structure? Well, if a narrative were a building, its screenplay structure would be its architectural blueprint. It provides the skeleton around which the meat of dialogue, character interaction, and visual imagery hang. With Alice, both Carroll and Burton display a mastery of their respective mediums. Carroll’s unstructured structure—episodic and dream-like—echoes the chaotic and boundless imagination of a child. On the flip side, Burton leans into the filmic language, ramping up conflicts and introducing a more archetypal villain in the Red Queen to propel the plot.
The rules of the game change dramatically when a classic like “Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland” is brought into the fray. It’s not just about staying faithful to the source material; it’s also about offering something new, something that warrants its existence as a separate entity. Here, Burton didn’t merely want to retell Alice’s story; he wanted to reinvent it, asking the question: What if Alice, now 19, returns to Wonderland, or as it is known here, Underland? This twist allows for character development while still keeping the essential whimsy and absurdity intact.
By deconstructing the narrative norms and pushing the boundaries of what we expect from an ‘Alice’ story, Burton creates a hybrid—a familiar tale with unfamiliar trappings. The Mad Hatter is no longer just a lunatic; he’s a freedom fighter. Alice isn’t just a girl lost in a dream; she’s a warrior destined for greatness. This isn’t your grandmother’s Alice; it’s an Alice for a new generation, and the difference lies in Burton’s screenplay structure. He retains essential elements like the Mad Tea Party, but they serve a broader narrative arc, making the story feel fresh yet familiar.
Writing a screenplay that both honors and innovates is a high-wire act. There are lessons here for anyone daring enough to adapt a classic. Burton’s Alice serves as a reminder that adaptation doesn’t mean replication. A successful adaptation, like any good piece of writing, comes with its unique voice and perspective. It takes risks, fiddles with the familiar, and in doing so, often makes us appreciate the original even more.
Through the Looking-Glass: Comparing Narratives
When we talk about “Alice in Wonderland,” it’s almost impossible not to delve into the labyrinth of differences between the Lewis Carroll original and Tim Burton’s film adaptation. Understanding these variations not only offers a glimpse into the idiosyncrasies of each medium but also serves as a practical workshop in the art of adaptation.
Let’s kick things off with the most glaring disparity: the narrative itself. In the book, Alice is a young girl navigating a whimsical and often nonsensical world, driven more by curiosity than by any overarching quest. Carroll employs an episodic structure, which allows Alice to roam freely and stumble upon one strange creature after another. It’s more about the journey, less about the destination.
In contrast, Tim Burton sets the stakes high from the get-go. Alice is no longer the little girl we remember; she’s a 19-year-old on the cusp of adulthood. Burton doesn’t just adapt the original narrative but blends in elements of Carroll’s sequel, “Through the Looking-Glass,” thereby offering us an Alice more complex and fraught with existential worries. By doing this, Burton essentially altered the screenplay structure to create a more linear, goal-oriented story, which is typically more palatable for contemporary audiences weaned on the Hero’s Journey and three-act structures.
So, what can budding screenwriters take away from this duality of storytelling methods? One key lesson is the importance of understanding your audience. Carroll wrote for a Victorian audience where the appeal lay in wit, wordplay, and episodic whimsy. Burton, on the other hand, adapted his version for a 21st-century audience, who often seek stories that offer not only escapism but also a character arc and closure.
The second takeaway revolves around what I’d like to call ‘purposeful deviation.’ If you’re writing a screenplay based on existing material, don’t be afraid to put your spin on it. For instance, you might find screenwriting tips that advocate for staying true to the source material, but adherence shouldn’t mean a lack of innovation. Burton brought in his unique visual style and thematic concerns (like Alice’s empowerment) that weren’t as pronounced in the original tale, providing a fresh take on a well-trodden story.
For those of you looking to adapt classics or even not-so-classics, a study of real-world examples can be enlightening. For instance, consider Peter Jackson’s “The Lord of the Rings” trilogy, where fidelity to J.R.R. Tolkien’s text was balanced with the demands of cinematic storytelling. The adaptation succeeded because it managed to capture the essence of the source material while making necessary adjustments for a different medium. Conversely, examples like the 2012 film “John Carter,” adapted from Edgar Rice Burroughs’ pulp novels, offer cautionary tales in how not to adapt. The movie faltered partly because it couldn’t decide whether to be faithful to the books or to reinvent them, resulting in a muddled narrative that pleased neither fans of the novels nor newcomers.
To sum up, the art of adaptation is a tightrope walk that demands a deep understanding of both the original narrative and the medium you’re adapting it into. In the case of “Alice in Wonderland,” the deviations in screenplay structure and narrative themes serve to enhance the story’s relevance and relatability to modern viewers. So the next time you’re knee-deep in writing a screenplay based on an existing work, remember: it’s not just about what you keep, but also about what you change and why.
Mad Hatter’s Tips: Learning from the Adaptation
At this point, it’s evident that Tim Burton’s “Alice in Wonderland” offers a trove of lessons in the art of adaptation, a playground of inspiration for any aspiring screenwriter. But how can you apply what you’ve observed from Burton’s Wonderland to your own projects? How do you honor the integrity of the original while also liberating your unique vision? Grab your pens and notebooks, dear writers; it’s time for some practical advice.
Writing Tips for Aspiring Screenwriters
If you’re new to the adaptation game, the first tip is to intimately understand your source material. Reading Lewis Carroll’s original work and its sequel, “Through the Looking-Glass,” should be a no-brainer. But don’t just read; analyze. Notice the recurring themes, character dynamics, and narrative techniques. This will not only help you decide what to keep but also guide you in augmenting these elements to fit your vision and medium.
As you dive into writing a screenplay, one thing to remember is: Film is a visual medium. Where Carroll could afford to dwell on verbal wit and intricate dialogues, your screenplay needs to translate these elements into visual storytelling. For example, instead of a verbose Cheshire Cat, Burton uses striking visual effects to bring the creature’s mystery to life.
Creating a Unique Vision While Honoring the Original
One of the key aspects where Burton succeeds is in incorporating his distinct visual style—Gothic aesthetics, elaborate costumes, and surreal landscapes—without veering too far from Carroll’s whimsical universe. That’s your next tip: Own your uniqueness as a screenwriter but ensure it complements the essence of the original story. It’s a fine line to walk, but as you gain more experience in screenwriting, understanding this balance becomes second nature.
If you’re wondering how to practically do this, start by outlining your screenplay. A well-thought-out screenplay structure not only maintains the pacing but also lets you decide where to stick to the original and where to add your personal touches. For instance, in the case of Burton’s Alice, a major departure is her age and the ‘Hero’s Quest,’ which isn’t in the book but serves his vision of a more mature, empowered Alice.
Screenwriting Prompts Inspired by ‘Alice in Wonderland’
For those who learn by doing, here are some screenwriting prompts to get your creative gears turning:
- Write a short scene where a modern Alice encounters a technology-driven Wonderland.
- Imagine a twist where Alice is not a visitor but a resident of Wonderland trying to escape. Write the opening scene.
- Take a secondary character like the Mad Hatter or the Queen of Hearts and reimagine them as the protagonist. What would their story look like?
Encouragement for Writers to Experiment with Adaptations
Look, tackling adaptations might seem like a daunting task, especially when handling classics, but don’t let that intimidate you. Think of it more as a collaboration with the original author across time and space. It’s your chance to contribute to an ongoing conversation, to revitalize an old tale for a new generation.
If you need further inspiration, study the works of those who’ve successfully translated literature to cinema. Films like “To Kill a Mockingbird” and “The Godfather” have shown that with the right approach, an adaptation can not only honor its source but also become a classic in its own right. So go ahead, pick up that book you’ve always loved, analyze its elements, and give writing a screenplay a shot.
In essence, the adventure of adaptation is much like Alice’s journey through Wonderland: filled with unexpected challenges, delightful surprises, and transformative experiences. Each project is a new rabbit hole, and who knows what creative wonders await you on the other side? So take that plunge, dear writers, and may your pens be as mighty as the Vorpal sword!
✍️ Whether you’re mastering the art of dialogue, structure, or character development, the power of AI can be a game-changer in your writing journey. My Free Ebook, ‘AI for Authors’ delves into how AI-powered prompts can provide a unique edge to your storytelling process. If you’re intrigued by the prospect of supercharging your fiction skills, download your free copy today and explore new horizons in creative writing.
A.I. in Screen Trade 